Referenced Items are not available for this document.
We present a study of the influence of motion on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The motion sensitivity of two MR methods is compared: 2D Fourier transform (2D-FT) imaging and projection reconstruction (PR). In case of PR, both the filtered backprojection (FB) reconstruction method and the Gmitro reconstruction method were considered. The PR technique proved to be less sensitive to motion than 2D-FT imaging. Furthermore, the Gmitro algorithm was able to correct artifacts caused by translational motion, as long as the motion frequency was chosen to be lower than a critical frequency
Published in:
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1995., IEEE 17th Annual Conference
(Volume:1
)
Date of Conference: 20-25 Sep 1995
- Page(s):
- 457 - 458 vol.1
- Meeting Date :
- 20 Sep 1995-23 Sep 1995
- Print ISBN:
- 0-7803-2475-7
- INSPEC Accession Number:
- 5601321
- Conference Location :
- Montreal, Que.
- Digital Object Identifier :
- 10.1109/IEMBS.1995.575198
- Product Type:
- Conference Publications
About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.
