Close category search window
 

Physics-Based Model Predictive Control of HCCI Combustion Phasing Using Fast Thermal Management and VVA

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Widd, A. ; Dept. of Autom. Control, Lund Univ., Lund, Sweden ; Ekholm, K. ; Tunestal, P. ; Johansson, R.

Homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) is a promising internal combustion engine concept. It holds promise of combining low emission levels with high efficiency. However, as ignition timing in HCCI operation lacks direct actuation and is highly sensitive to operating conditions and disturbances, robust closed-loop control is necessary. To facilitate control design and allow for porting of both models and the resulting controllers between different engines, physics-based mathematical models of HCCI are of interest. This paper presents work on a physical model of HCCI including cylinder wall temperature and evaluates predictive controllers based on linearizations of the model. The model was derived using first principles and formulated on a cycle-to-cycle basis. The resulting model was of second order with two inputs and two outputs. Measurement data including cylinder wall temperature measurements was used for calibration and validation of the model. Predictive control of the combustion phasing was then evaluated experimentally using ethanol as fuel. The control signals were the intake temperature and the inlet valve closing timing. The control performance was evaluated in terms of response time and steady-state output variance. Multi-cylinder control experiments were also carried out.

Published in:
Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:20 ,  Issue: 3 )

Date of Publication: May 2012

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.