Close category search window
 

Improved Method for Frequency Estimation of Sampled Sinusoidal Signals Without Iteration

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Soon Young Park ; Artificial Intell. Lab., Kyungpook Nat. Univ., Daegu, South Korea ; Young Sub Song ; Hang Joon Kim ; Jongsik Park

This paper presents a method for estimating the signal frequency of sampled sinusoidal signals, which does not require any iteration for the frequency search. A noniterative method of frequency estimation was already developed by Zhang , where an analytical expression for the signal frequency is obtained using the differences between the neighboring input data. However, this method is very susceptible to additive noise. This paper extends the algorithm of Zhang to maintain the same signal-to-noise ratio as with the traditional four-parameter estimation method that requires iterations for the signal frequency search. Unfortunately, the proposed method is unable to estimate the accurate frequency in the case of an infinite number of data points when noises are added to the signal. From a noise analysis, it was found that the average frequency estimation error becomes zero when using a (2/3)π phase interval to calculate the signal difference. Numerical simulation results show that the frequency estimation error when Gaussian noise is added to the input data is about 13% higher than the square root of the Cramer-Rao bound. An additional 6% error is also added when the phase interval for frequency estimation deviates 10% from (2/3)π . Furthermore, it was found that the effect of harmonic components on the frequency estimation error can be minimized when the phase interval is close to (2/3)π, and the total number of data sample covers several signal periods or truncated close to an integer multiple of the signal period. As a result, the frequency estimation with the proposed method is more than 40 times more accurate than that with the IEEE-1057 method when the harmonic components are added to the input signal, which is confirmed by numerical simulations.

Published in:
Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:60 ,  Issue: 8 )

Date of Publication: Aug. 2011

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.