By Topic

Retrieval of Leaf Biochemical Parameters Using PROSPECT Inversion: A New Approach for Alleviating Ill-Posed Problems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Pingheng Li ; Xinjiang Inst. of Ecology & Geogr., Chinese Acad. of Sci., Urumqi, China ; Quan Wang

Retrieval of leaf biochemical parameters from reflectance measurements using model inversion generally faces “ill-posed” problems, which dramatically decreases the estimation accuracy of an inverse model. While the standard approach for model inversion retrieves various parameters simultaneously, usually only based on one merit function, the new approach proposed in this paper assigns a specific merit function for each retrieved parameter. Each merit function is specified in terms of the wavelength domains that the given parameter was found to be specifically sensitive to in an earlier sensitivity analysis. The approach has been validated with both in situ measured data sets and an artificial data set of 10 000 spectra simulated by the PROSPECT model. Results indicate that the new approach greatly improves the performance of inversion models, with root-mean-square error (rmse) values for chlorophyll content (Chl), equivalent water thickness (EWT), and leaf mass per area (LMA), based on the simulated data, of 7.12 μg/cm2, 0.0012 g/cm2 , and 0.0019 g/cm2, respectively, compared with 11.36 μg/cm2, 0.0032 g/cm2, and 0.0040 g/cm2 when using the standard approach. As for field-measured data sets, the proposed approach also greatly outperformed the standard approach, with respective rmse values of 8.11 μg/cm2, 0.0012 g/cm2, and 0.0008 g/cm2 for Chl, EWT, and LMA when all data are pooled, compared with 11.84 μg/cm2, 0.0020 g/cm2, and 0.0027 g/cm2 when using the standard approach. Hence, the proposed approach for model inversion can largely alleviate the “ill-posed” problem, and it could be widely applied for retrieving leaf biochemical parameters.

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:49 ,  Issue: 7 )