By Topic

Implementation on Landsat Data of a Simple Cloud-Mask Algorithm Developed for MODIS Land Bands

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Oreopoulos, L. ; Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA ; Wilson, M.J. ; Várnai, T.

This letter assesses the performance on Landsat-7 images of a modified version of a cloud-masking algorithm originally developed for clear-sky compositing of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer images at northern midlatitudes. While most historical Landsat data include measurements at thermal wavelengths and such measurements are also planned for the next mission, thermal tests are not included in the suggested algorithm in order to maintain greater versatility and ease of use. The evaluation of the masking algorithm takes advantage of the availability of manual (visual) cloud masks developed at the U.S. Geological Survey for a collection of Landsat scenes. As part of the evaluation, we also include the automated cloud cover assessment (ACCA) algorithm which does include thermal tests and is used operationally by the Landsat-7 mission to provide scene cloud fractions but no cloud masks. We show that the proposed algorithm performs on par with the ACCA both in terms of scene cloud fraction and pixel-level mask agreement. Specifically, the algorithm gives an error of 0.8% for the scene cloud fraction of 156 scenes and a root-mean-square error of 7.1%, while it agrees with the manual mask for 93.1% of the pixels. These performance indicators are very similar to those of the ACCA (1.2%, 7.1%, and 93.7%).

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE  (Volume:8 ,  Issue: 4 )