By Topic

A Theoretical Analysis of the Effects of Aliasing and Misregistration on Pansharpened Imagery

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Baronti, S. ; Ist. di Fis. Applicata Nello Carrara IFAC-CNR, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy ; Aiazzi, B. ; Selva, M. ; Garzelli, A.
more authors

In this paper, the characteristics of multispectral (MS) and panchromatic (P) image fusion methods are investigated. Depending on the way spatial details are extracted from P, pansharpening methods can be broadly labeled into two main classes, corresponding to methods based on either component substitution (CS) or multiresolution analysis (MRA). Theoretical investigations and experimental results evidence that CS-based fusion is far less sensitive than MRA-based fusion to: 1) registration errors, i.e., spatial misalignments between MS and P images, possibly originated by cartographic projection and resampling of individual data sets; 2) aliasing occurring in MS bands and stemming from modulation transfer functions (MTF) of MS channels that are excessively broad for the sampling step. In order to assess the sensitiveness of methods, aliasing is simulated at degraded spatial scale by means of several MTF-shaped digital filters. Analogously, simulated misalignments, carried out at both full and degraded scale, evidence the quality-shift tradeoff of the two classes. MRA yields a slightly superior quality in the absence of aliasing/misalignments, but is more penalized than CS, whenever either aliasing or shifts between MS and P occur. Conversely, CS generally produces a slightly lower quality, but is intrinsically more aliasing/shift tolerant.

Published in:

Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of  (Volume:5 ,  Issue: 3 )