Close category search window
 

Practical completion detection for 2-of-N delay-insensitive codes

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Cannizzaro, M. ; Politec. di Torino, Turin, Italy ; Weiwei Jiang ; Nowick, S.M.

There is increasing interest in using m-of-n delay-insensitive codes for robust asynchronous global communication, to support the design of coding-efficient and low-power channels. However, a fundamental obstacle in using these codes has been complex and expensive hardware support. This paper addresses this issue, introducing and evaluating practical completion detector units for 2-of-n codes. Designs are proposed for both return-to-zero (RZ) and non-return-to-zero (NRZ) codes. The RZ designs build on prior work of Piestrak [14]; this paper proposes a small modification to their work to provide a fully timing-robust (i.e. quasi-delay insensitive, or QDI) version. The main contribution of the paper is an efficient completion for NRZ 2-of-n codes. Both detector architectures are modular and simple, composed of basic cells in a binary tree. Initial simulation results were performed on several implementations of a 2-of-9 detector using Cadence's Spectre environment, after mapping to a 90nm standard cell library. The new RZ detector has 35% area reduction and comparable delays and energy to the earlier Piestrak design, but unlike the latter, ensures robust QDI operation. The new NRZ detector is shown to have negligible stabilization time between successive codewords (0.05-0.19 ns) when compared to a recent alternative approach.

Published in:
Computer Design (ICCD), 2010 IEEE International Conference on

Date of Conference: 3-6 Oct. 2010

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.