By Topic

Improved Video Compression Efficiency Through Flexible Unit Representation and Corresponding Extension of Coding Tools

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

15 Author(s)
Woo-Jin Han ; Digital Media & Commun. R&D Center, Samsung Electron., Suwon, South Korea ; Junghye Min ; Il-Koo Kim ; Alshina, E.
more authors

This paper proposes a novel video compression scheme based on a highly flexible hierarchy of unit representation which includes three block concepts: coding unit (CU), prediction unit (PU), and transform unit (TU). This separation of the block structure into three different concepts allows each to be optimized according to its role; the CU is a macroblock-like unit which supports region splitting in a manner similar to a conventional quadtree, the PU supports nonsquare motion partition shapes for motion compensation, while the TU allows the transform size to be defined independently from the PU. Several other coding tools are extended to arbitrary unit size to maintain consistency with the proposed design, e.g., transform size is extended up to 64 × 64 and intraprediction is designed to support an arbitrary number of angles for variable block sizes. Other novel techniques such as a new noncascading interpolation Alter design allowing arbitrary motion accuracy and a leaky prediction technique using both open-loop and closed-loop predictors are also introduced. The video codec described in this paper was a candidate in the competitive phase of the high-efficiency video coding (HEVC) standardization work. Compared to H.264/AVC, it demonstrated bit rate reductions of around 40% based on objective measures and around 60% based on subjective testing with 1080 p sequences. It has been partially adopted into the first standardization model of the collaborative phase of the HEVC effort.

Published in:

Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:20 ,  Issue: 12 )