Close category search window
 

Generalized Probabilistic Decision-Based Neural Networks for texture classification and retrieval

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Yeong-Yuh Xu ; Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Inf. Eng., Hungkuang Univ., Taichung, Taiwan ; Chuang, S.C. ; Tseng, C.-L. ; Hsin-Chia Fu

For various applications, formulating texture features in distributional forms can sometimes provide meaningful representation than in numerical forms. In this paper, we first proposed a novel methodology for measuring the difference between two mixture Gaussian distributions. Based on the derived formula, a Generalized Probabilistic Decision-Based Neural Network (GPDNN) is then proposed and implemented to realize the difference measurement method. By constructing a two layered pyramid-type network structure, the proposed GPDNN receives data in distributional form via 2-D grid input nodes, and outputs the classification and/or retrieval results from the top layer node. Forty texture images are selected from the MIT Vision Texture (VisTex) database to evaluate the proposed GPDNN for the texture classification and retrieval. Experimental results show that (1) by using the proposed difference measurement methods, the texture pattern retrieval rates can be improved from 77% to 82%, compared with some published leading methods, and (2) the proposed GPDNN shows significant texture classification and retrieval performance, which are about 90:1% and 88:6% of the accuracy, and much better than the traditional methods, i.e., 82.2% and 79.9%, respectively.

Published in:
Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC), The 2010 International Conference on

Date of Conference: 17-19 July 2010

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.