By Topic

Providing fairness between TCP NewReno and TCP Vegas with RD network services

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Podlesny, M. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada ; Williamson, C.

While Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) variants with delay-based congestion control (e.g., TCP Vegas) provide low queueing delay and low packet loss, the key problem with their deployment on the Internet is their relative performance when competing with traditional TCP variants with loss-based congestion control (e.g., TCP NewReno). In particular, the more aggressive loss-based flows tend to dominate link buffer usage and degrade the throughput of delay-based flows. In this paper, we study a novel approach for achieving fair sharing of the network resources among TCP variants, using Rate-Delay (RD) Network Services. In particular, loss-based and delay-based flows are isolated from each other and served via different queues. Using extensive ns-2 network simulation experiments, we show that our approach is effective in providing fairness between loss-based NewReno and delay-based Vegas flows.

Published in:

Quality of Service (IWQoS), 2010 18th International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

16-18 June 2010