Scheduled System Maintenance:
Some services will be unavailable Sunday, March 29th through Monday, March 30th. We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

vPnP: Automated coordination of power and performance in virtualized datacenters

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Jiayu Gong ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Wayne State Univ., Detroit, MI, USA ; Cheng-Zhong Xu

Both power and performance are important issues in today's datacenters. It is hard to achieve optimization in both aspects on shared infrastructures due to system dynamics. Previous work mostly emphasized on either aspect or relied on models that were trained off-line for specific workload. In this paper, we present vPnP, a feedback control-based coordination system that provides guarantees on a service level agreement with respect to performance and a power budget in virtualized environments. This system can adapt gracefully to workload change. It consists of two self-tuning model predictors and a utility function optimizer. The predictors correlate system resource allocation to power and performance, respectively. The optimizer finds the optimal solution for a tradeoff between power and performance. Experimental results using TPC-W benchmark show vPnP can achieve different levels of tradeoff in a more flexible way than an existing two-layer feedback control approach. More importantly, vPnP shows its robustness over a variety of workloads. It reduces performance relative deviation by 17% compared with the two-layer feedback controller.

Published in:

Quality of Service (IWQoS), 2010 18th International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

16-18 June 2010