Close category search window
 

Effect of pathologist agreement on evaluating a computer-aided assisted system: Recognizing centroblast cells in follicular lymphoma cases

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Belkacem-Boussaid, K. ; Dept. of Biomed. Inf., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH, USA ; Pennell, M. ; Lozanski, G. ; Shana'ah, A.
more authors

In this paper, a novel automated method to recognize centroblast (CB) cells from non-centroblast (non-CB) cells in follicular lymphoma cases is developed and its performance is evaluated against consensus of 30 board-certified hematopathologists. Morphometric and color texture features are used in the training and testing of a supervised quadratic discriminate analysis (QDA) classifier. The novelty of our method resides in the identification of the CB cells with prior information, and the introduction of the principal component analysis (PCA) in the spectral domain to extract texture color features. A graphical user interface was developed to display CB and non-CB cells without the computer-classification to the hematopathologists and their responses were recorded by the software. Our automated grading system performed well when compared to consensus diagnosis of 30 hematopathologists. Automated classification can identify centroblast cells (CB) from non-centroblast cells (non-CB) with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8%, 86.4%, respectively. The developed system was tested on an independent set of cases with a consensus of 16 or 20 hematopathologists. The sensitivity and specificity of the developed system is higher when the ground truth is based on the consensus of 20 pathologists.

Published in:
Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on

Date of Conference: 14-17 April 2010

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.