By Topic

The Rutgers Arm II Rehabilitation System—A Feasibility Study

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Grigore C. Burdea ; Tele-Rehabilitation Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA ; Daniel Cioi ; Joseph Martin ; Devin Fensterheim
more authors

The Rutgers Arm II (RA II) is a new system that trains the shoulder/arm motor control, strengthening, arm speed of motion, endurance, and grasp strength in a single rehabilitation session. The system components are a tilted low-friction table, a forearm support with markers and wireless transmitter, a shoulder appendage to detect compensatory leaning, infrared vision tracking, a large display and a PC running custom virtual reality games. Three participants in the chronic stage post-stroke were trained on the RAII for four weeks (12 sessions) and had a follow-up evaluation after three months. The results of this study indicate that the participants were able to use the technology, and preliminary results are encouraging. One participant showed improvement in all timed Jebsen-Taylor test tasks, all participants had a larger shoulder range-of-motion and pinch strength of the affected hand post-training. Computerized measure of supported arm reach area increased in two participants post-training and in all participants at follow-up. Participants reported an improved ability to perform activities of daily living with the affected arm. There was good compliance by the participants, each of whom attended all sessions. The participants accepted the training length, even with some sessions lasting 1 h (excluding rest periods). The participants' subjective evaluation rated the system an average 3.7 out of 5 (see also the accompanying taped video interview of one of the participants).

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering  (Volume:18 ,  Issue: 5 )