Scheduled System Maintenance:
Some services will be unavailable Sunday, March 29th through Monday, March 30th. We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Unified scaling factor approach for turbo decoding algorithms

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Yue, D.-W. ; Coll. of Inf. Sci. & Technol., Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian, China ; Nguyen, H.H.

Turbo (iterative) decoding can be implemented with a large family of soft-input soft-output (SISO) algorithms, including suboptimal but practical algorithms such as the soft-output Viterbi algorithm (SOVA) and max-log-MAP algorithm. The performance with these practical algorithms can be improved with simple scaling factor methods. However, their theoretical analysis was mainly based on the relaxed assumption proposed by Papke et al. that the extrinsic information is Gaussian distributed. This study proposes a novel scaling factor approach for reducing both the overestimation of reliability values and the correlation between the intrinsic and extrinsic information. Explicit formulae for computing the scaling factors are derived based on mathematical statistics. A key difference compared to the scaling factor method of Papke et al. is that the proposed scaling factors can be computed off-line. The numerical results show that when implemented in the decoding algorithm of block component codes, the proposed scaling factor approach improves the performance of turbo decoding over additive white Gaussian noise and Rayleigh fading channels. It is superior than the method by Papke et al. in both performance and complexity.

Published in:

Communications, IET  (Volume:4 ,  Issue: 8 )