Close category search window
 

Analysis of approximate message passing algorithm

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Maleki, A. ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA ; Montanari, A.

Finding fast recovery algorithms is a problem of significant interest in compressed sensing. In many applications, extremely large problem sizes are envisioned, with at least tens of thousands of equations and hundreds of thousands of unknowns. The interior point methods for solving the best studied algorithm -?1 minimization- are very slow and hence they are ineffective for such problem sizes. Faster methods such as LARS or homotopy have been proposed for solving ?1 minimization but there is still a need for algorithms with less computational complexity. Therefore there is a fast growing literature on greedy methods and iterative thresholding for finding the sparsest solution. It was shown by that most of these algorithms perform worse than ?1 when it comes to the sparsity-measurement tradeoff. In a recent paper the authors introduced a new algorithm called AMP which is as fast as iterative soft thresholding algorithms proposed before and performs exactly the same as ?1 minimization. This algorithm is inspired from the message passing algorithms on bipartite graphs. The statistical properties of AMP let the authors propose a theoretical framework to analyze the asymptotic performance of the algorithm. This results in very sharp predictions of different observables in the algorithm. In this paper we address several questions regarding the thresholding policy. We consider a very general thresholding policy ?(?) for the algorithm and will use the maxmin framework to tune it optimally. It is shown that when formulated in this general form, the maxmin thresholding policy is not unique and many different thresholding policies may lead to the same phase transition. We will then propose two very simple thresholding policies that can be implemented easily in practice and prove that they are both maxmin. This analysis will also shed some light on several other aspects of the algorithm, such as the least favorable distribution and s- - imilarity of all maxmin optimal thresholding policies. We will also show how one can derive the AMP algorithm from the full message passing algorithm.

Published in:
Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), 2010 44th Annual Conference on

Date of Conference: 17-19 March 2010

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.