By Topic

A Low Complexity Blind Estimator of Narrowband Polynomial Phase Signals

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Amar, A. ; Fac. of Electr. Eng., Delft Univ. of Technol., Delft, Netherlands ; Leshem, A. ; van der Veen, A.-J.

Consider the problem of estimating the parameters of multiple polynomial phase signals observed by a sensor array. In practice, it is difficult to maintain a precisely calibrated array. The array manifold is then assumed to be unknown, and the estimation is referred to as blind estimation. To date, only an approximated maximum likelihood estimator (AMLE) was suggested for blindly estimating the polynomial coefficients of each signal. However, this estimator requires a multidimensional search over the entire coefficient space. Instead, we propose an estimation approach which is based on two steps. First, the signals are separated using a blind source separation technique, which exploits the constant modulus property of the signals. Then, the coefficients of each polynomial are estimated using a least squares method applied to the unwrapped phase of the estimated signal. This estimator does not involve any search in the coefficient spaces. The computational complexity of the proposed estimator increases linearly with respect to the polynomial order, whereas that of the AMLE increases exponentially. Simulation results show that the proposed estimator achieves the Cramér-Rao lower bound at moderate or high signal to noise ratio.

Published in:

Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:58 ,  Issue: 9 )