Close category search window
 

Algorithm for estimating the attenuation slope from backscattered ultrasonic signals

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

9 Author(s)
Haak, A. ; Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA ; Hafez, Z.T. ; Anderson, J.J. ; Herd, M.-T.
more authors

In vivo attenuation slope measurements usually utilize the backscattered signal from pulse/echo ultrasound. In this work the down shift of the center frequency of an emitted ultrasound pulse with penetration depth is utilized to estimate the attenuation slope. A diffraction correction of the focused ultrasound source is performed by measuring the reflection from a planar surface positioned throughout the depth of focus. A focused single element transducer with a measured center frequency of 8.2 MHz and a fractional band width of 72% was used to interrogate four tissue mimicking phantoms. The scatterers in the tissue mimicking phantoms were glass spheres embedded in a gelatin/milk matrix. In one set of the phantoms, the backscattering strength was varied; in the other set of phantoms the attenuation slope was varied. The attenuation slope (ASBS) was estimated using pulse/echo data obtained by scanning the phantoms. The ¿true¿ attenuation slope (ASThru) was obtained from two independent insertion loss measurements performed at two different laboratories. The relative error of ASBS was investigated for different regions of interest (ROI) for all phantoms. Three different axial and lateral ROI sizes were tested. It was observed that the average relative error (average over all four phantoms) changed by less than three percent when the lateral size of the ROI was decreased by seventy percent. The axial size of the ROI was changed by thirty percent whereas the average error changed by less then three percent.

Published in:
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2009 IEEE International

Date of Conference: 20-23 Sept. 2009

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.