Referenced Items are not available for this document.
This paper compares 2 approaches to 3-D ultrasonic axial strain imaging: a tracked ultrasound probe swept manually over a volume, and a mechanically-swept 3-D probe. We find that high-quality data are more easily obtained using the 3-D probe, but the freehand approach may be more practical in certain scanning situations.
Published in:
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on
(Volume:57
,
Issue:
2
)
Date of Publication: February 2010
- Page(s):
- 501 - 506
- ISSN :
- 0885-3010
- INSPEC Accession Number:
- 11138207
- Digital Object Identifier :
- 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1431
- Product Type:
- Journals & Magazines
- Date of Current Version :
- 18 February 2010
- Issue Date :
- February 2010
- Sponsored by :
- IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Society
- PubMed ID :
- 20178917
About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.
