By Topic

Estimation and Error Analysis of Woody Canopy Leaf Area Density Profiles Using 3-D Airborne and Ground-Based Scanning Lidar Remote-Sensing Techniques

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Fumiki Hosoi ; Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan ; Yohei Nakai ; Kenji Omasa

Vertical profiles of the leaf area density (LAD) of a Japanese zelkova canopy were estimated by combining airborne and portable ground-based light detection and ranging (lidar) data and using a voxel-based canopy profiling method. The profiles obtained by the two types of lidars complemented each other, eliminating blind regions and yielding more accurate LAD profiles than could be obtained by using each type of lidar alone. In the combined results, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of LAD ranged from 0.20 to 0.42 m2 m-3, and the mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) of the leaf area index (LAI) ranged from 22.3% to 27.2%, for ground areas from 4 to 32 m2, respectively. A laser beam coverage index ?? incorporating the lidar's beam settings and a beam attenuation factor was proposed. This index showed general applicability to explain the LAD estimation error for LAD measurements using different types of lidars and with different beam settings. Parts of the LAD profiles that were underestimated even when data from both lidars were combined were interpolated by using a Gaussian function. The interpolation yielded improved results for ground areas of 16 and 32 m2; the respective MAEs of LAD were 0.17 and 0.11 m2 m-3, and the respective MAPEs of LAI were 8.0% and 9.4%. The proposed method improves lidar-derived LAD estimation and is adapted to broadleaved canopies. The index ?? was tested against an actual canopy scenario and could be used to determine appropriate lidar measurement settings when data from different sources of lidar data are combined to estimate LAD profiles.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing  (Volume:48 ,  Issue: 5 )