By Topic

Sensitivity of Time-Resolved Fluorescence Analysis Methods for Disease Detection

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Agrawal, A. ; Opt. Diagnostic Devices Lab., Food & Drug Adm., Silver Spring, MD, USA ; Gallas, B.D. ; Parker, C. ; Agrawal, K.M.
more authors

Time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) measurements of biological tissue provide chemical and structural information useful for detecting subtle disease processes, including cancers originating in mucosal tissues. A number of techniques for analyzing such TRF measurements exist, but they have not yet been compared to determine which of them can provide the greatest sensitivity to differences between a TRF measurement from nondiseased tissue and one from diseased tissue. We have evaluated four TRF analysis methods in this study: biexponential curve fitting, monoexponential curve fitting, Laguerre function representation, and computing the area under the decay curve (AUDC). We performed this study on a large dataset of computer-generated TRF decay curves based on colonic mucosa and typical measurement instrumentation. We statistically determined the minimum detectable change (MDC) in the relative contribution of each mucosal layer to the total TRF signal with each analysis method. We also determined the MDC in fluorescence lifetime of the upper mucosal layer. These two types of changes are due to the structural and biochemical changes expected in mucosa with onset of neoplasia. Under a wide range of baseline conditions, the monoexponential, AUDC, and Laguerre analysis methods all yield dramatically superior sensitivity and robustness over the standard biexponential method, with several caveats.

Published in:

Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of  (Volume:16 ,  Issue: 4 )