By Topic

Experimental comparison of piezoresistive MEMS and fiber bragg grating strain sensors

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)
Rausch, J. ; Inst. of Electromech. Design, Darmstadt Univ. of Technol., Darmstadt, Germany ; Heinickel, P. ; Werthschuetzky, R. ; Koegel, B.
more authors

We report on the experimental comparison of piezoresistive MEMS sensors and optical fiber Bragg grating sensors (FBGS) for strain measurements in force sensors. To our knowledge, this is the first direct comparison of piezoresistive and FBG transducers as force sensors. Cantilevers are used as deformation elements. The sensors are bonded on top and bottom side of the cantilever using a heat-curing epoxy adhesive. The piezoresistive ones are micro machined silicon chips with decoupled adhesive areas, and four ion implanted piezoresistive areas (Rsq = 125 ¿·cm, (1 × 2) mm2 × 350 ¿m). The FBGS are draw-tower-gratings (0.78 mm2 × 9 mm). The measured values are compared by analyzing nominal strain, sensitivity, resolution, measurement uncertainty and thermal behavior. The MEMS sensor is more sensitive than the FBGS (0.28%, /N > 0.004%/N), its measurement uncertainty is lower (2% < 5%) and the resolution ¿¿ = 10-3 ¿m/m is 100 times higher than in case of FBGS ¿¿ = 1.38 ¿m/m.

Published in:

Sensors, 2009 IEEE

Date of Conference:

25-28 Oct. 2009