Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Multiobjective optimization of combinatorial libraries

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Agrafiotis, D.K. ; 3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 665 Stockton Drive, Suite 104, Exton, Pennsylvania 19341, USA

Combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening have caused a fundamental shift in the way chemists contemplate experiments. Designing a combinatorial library is a controversial art that involves a heterogeneous mix of chemistry, mathematics, economics, experience, and intuition. Although there seems to be little agreement as to what constitutes an ideal library, one thing is certain: Only one property or measure seldom defines the quality of the design. In most real-world applications, a good experiment requires the simultaneous optimization of several, often conflicting, design objectives, some of which may be vague and uncertain. In this paper, we discuss a class of algorithms for subset selection rooted in the principles of multiobjective optimization. Our approach is to employ an objective function that encodes all of the desired selection criteria, and then use a simulated annealing or evolutionary approach to identify the optimal (or a nearly optimal) subset from among the vast number of pos sibilities. Many design criteria can be accommodated, including diversity, similarity to known actives, predicted activity and/or selectivity determined by quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models or receptor binding models, enforcement of certain property distributions, reagent cost and availability, and many others. The method is robust, convergent, and extensible, offers the user full control over the relative significance of the various objectives in the final design, and permits the simultaneous selection of compounds from multiple libraries in full- or sparse-array format.

Note: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Incorporated is distributing this Article with permission of the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) who is the exclusive owner. The recipient of this Article may not assign, sublicense, lease, rent or otherwise transfer, reproduce, prepare derivative works, publicly display or perform, or distribute the Article.  

Published in:

IBM Journal of Research and Development  (Volume:45 ,  Issue: 3.4 )

Date of Publication:

May 2001

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.