By Topic

Composite design facilities of six programming languages

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)

A summary and comparison of language attributes is given in Table 1. Of the six languages surveyed, PL/I and FORTRAN are best suited to composite design. COBOL is also well suited, provided that modules are represented as subprograms, and not as performed paragraphs. Composite design can be used with APL, although the APL problems discussed often cause undesirable compromises to be made. Composite design does not lend itself well to the design of RPG and ALGOL program: both lack the concept of a module, and RPG lacks the concept of arguments and parameters.

Note: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Incorporated is distributing this Article with permission of the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) who is the exclusive owner. The recipient of this Article may not assign, sublicense, lease, rent or otherwise transfer, reproduce, prepare derivative works, publicly display or perform, or distribute the Article.  

Published in:

IBM Systems Journal  (Volume:15 ,  Issue: 3 )