Scheduled System Maintenance on May 29th, 2015:
IEEE Xplore will be upgraded between 11:00 AM and 10:00 PM EDT. During this time there may be intermittent impact on performance. We apologize for any inconvenience.
By Topic

Non-Iterative Method for Modeling Systematic Data Errors in Power System Risk Assessment

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Dent, C.J. ; Sch. of Eng. & Comput. Sci., Durham Univ., Durham, UK ; Bialek, J.W.

This paper provides a new framework for modeling uncertainty in the input data for power system risk calculations, and the error bars that this places on the results. Differently from previous work, systematic error in unit availability probabilities is considered as well as random error, and a closed-form expression is supplied for the error bars on the results. This closed-form expression reveals the relative contribution of different sources of error much more transparently than iterative methods. The new approach is demonstrated using the thermal units connected to the Great Britain transmission system. The availability probabilities used are generic type availabilities, published rounded to the nearest 5% by the system operator. Very wide error bars on the results of risk calculations result from the use of these probabilities; however, this is only revealed by modeling of the systematic error caused by the rounding. The approach is also used to investigate quantitatively the widely acknowledged view that comparing relative risks is a more robust use of simulated risk indices than stating absolute risk levels.

Published in:

Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:26 ,  Issue: 1 )