By Topic

Optimizing Communication Scheduling Using Dataflow Semantics

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Adrian Soviani ; Dept. of Comput. Sci., Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ, USA ; Jaswinder Pal Singh

We show how coarse grain dataflow semantics (CGD) applied to SPMD algorithms makes application development and design space exploration simpler compared to message passing, at the same time providing on par performance. CGD applications are specified as dependencies between computation modules and data distributions. Communication and synchronization are added automatically and optimized for specific architectures, relieving programmers of this task. Many high level algorithm changes are easy to implement in CGD by redefining data distributions. These include exposing communication overlap by decreasing task grain, and aggregating communication by replicating data and computation. We briefly present a coordination language with dataflow semantics that implements the CGD model. Our implementation currently supports MPI, SHMEM, and pthreads. Results on Altix 4700 show our optimized CGD FT is 27% faster than original NPB 2.3 MPI implementation, and optimized CGD stencil has a 41% advantage over handwritten MPI.

Published in:

2009 International Conference on Parallel Processing

Date of Conference:

22-25 Sept. 2009