Scheduled System Maintenance:
On May 6th, single article purchases and IEEE account management will be unavailable from 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET (12:00 - 21:00 UTC). We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Physical layer impairment aware routing (PLIAR) in WDM optical networks: issues and challenges

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Saradhi, C.V. ; Dept. of Broadband & Wireless Commun., Create-Net, Trento, Italy ; Subramaniam, S.S.

In WDM optical networks, the physical layer impairments (PLIs) and their significance depend on network type-opaque, translucent, or transparent; the reach-access, metro, or core/long-haul; the number and type of network elements-fiber, wavelengths, amplifiers, switching elements, etc.; and the type of applications-real-time, non-real time, missioncritical, etc. In transparent optical networks, PLIs incurred by non-ideal optical transmission media accumulate along an optical path, and the overall effect determines the feasibility of the lightpaths. If the received signal quality is not within the receiver sensitivity threshold, the receiver may not be able to correctly detect the optical signal and this may result in high bit-error rates. Hence, it is important to understand various PLIs and their effect on optical feasibility, analytical models, and monitoring and mitigation techniques. Introducing optical transparency in the physical layer on one hand leads to a dynamic, flexible optical layer with the possibility of adding intelligence such as optical performance monitoring, fault management, etc. On the other hand, transparency reduces the possibility of client layer interaction with the optical layer at intermediate nodes along the path. This has an impact on network design, planning, control, and management. Hence, it is important to understand the techniques that provide PLI information to the control plane protocols and that use this information efficiently to compute feasible routes and wavelengths. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive survey of various PLIs, their effects, and the available modeling and mitigation techniques. We then present a comprehensive survey of various PLI-aware network design techniques, regenerator placement algorithms, routing and wavelength assignment algorithms, and PLI-aware failure recovery algorithms. Furthermore, we identify several important research issues that need to be addressed to realize dynamical- ly reconfigurable next-generation optical networks. We also argue the need for PLI-aware control plane protocol extensions and present several interesting issues that need to be considered in order for these extensions to be deployed in real-world networks.

Published in:

Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE  (Volume:11 ,  Issue: 4 )