By Topic

Comparing Different Approaches to Treat Translation Ambiguity in CLIR: Structured Queries vs. Target Co-occurrence Based Selection

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Saralegi, X. ; R&D Elhuyar Found., Usurbil, Spain ; Lopez de Lacalle, M.

Two main problems in Cross-language Information Retrieval are translation selection and the treatment of out-of-vocabulary terms. In this paper, we will be focusing on the problem concerning the translation selection. Structured queries and target co-occurrence-based methods seem to be the most appropriate approaches when parallel corpora are not available. However, there is no comparative study. In this paper we compare the results obtained using each of the aforementioned methods, we specify the weaknesses of each method, and finally we propose a hybrid method to combine both. In terms of mean average precision, results for Basque-English cross-lingual retrieval show that structured queries are the best approach both with long queries and short queries.

Published in:

Database and Expert Systems Application, 2009. DEXA '09. 20th International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

Aug. 31 2009-Sept. 4 2009