By Topic

Reasons for a pessimistic or optimistic message logging protocol in MPI uncoordinated failure, recovery

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Bouteiller, A. ; Innovative Comput. Lab., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA ; Ropars, T. ; Bosilca, G. ; Morin, C.
more authors

With the growing scale of high performance computing platforms, fault tolerance has become a major issue. Among the various approaches for providing fault tolerance to MPI applications, message logging has been proved to tolerate higher failure rate. However, this advantage comes at the expense of a higher overhead on communications, due to latency intrusive logging of events to a stable storage. Previous work proposed and evaluated several protocols relaxing the synchronicity of event logging to moderate this overhead. Recently, the model of message logging has been refined to better match the reality of high performance network cards, where message receptions are decomposed in multiple interdependent events. According to this new model, deterministic and non-deterministic events are clearly discriminated, reducing the overhead induced by message logging. In this paper we compare, experimentally, a pessimistic and an optimistic message logging protocol, using this new model and implemented in the Open MPI library. Although pessimistic and optimistic message logging are, respectively, the most and less synchronous message logging paradigms, experiments show that most of the time their performance is comparable.

Published in:

Cluster Computing and Workshops, 2009. CLUSTER '09. IEEE International Conference on

Date of Conference:

Aug. 31 2009-Sept. 4 2009