Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Comparison of Speaker Adaptation Methods as Feature Extraction for SVM-Based Speaker Recognition

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Ferras, M. ; LIMSI-CNRS, Orsay, France ; Cheung-Chi Leung ; Barras, C. ; Gauvain, J.

In the last years the speaker recognition field has made extensive use of speaker adaptation techniques. Adaptation allows speaker model parameters to be estimated using less speech data than needed for maximum-likelihood (ML) training. The maximum a posteriori (MAP) and maximum-likelihood linear regression (MLLR) techniques have typically been used for adaptation. Recently, MAP and MLLR adaptation have been incorporated in the feature extraction stage of support vector machine (SVM)-based speaker recognition systems. Two approaches to feature extraction use a SVM to classify either the MAP-adapted Gaussian mean vector parameters (GSV-SVM) or the MLLR transform coefficients (MLLR-SVM). In this paper, we provide an experimental analysis of the GSV-SVM and MLLR-SVM approaches. We largely focus on the latter by exploring constrained and unconstrained transforms and different choices of the acoustic model. A channel-compensated front-end is used to prevent the MLLR transforms to adapt to channel components in the speech data. Additional acoustic models were trained using speaker adaptive training (SAT) to better estimate the speaker MLLR transforms. We provide results on the NIST 2005 and 2006 Speaker Recognition Evaluation (SRE) data and fusion results on the SRE 2006 data. The results show that using the compensated front-end, SAT models and multiple regression classes bring major performance improvements.

Published in:

Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:18 ,  Issue: 6 )
Biometrics Compendium, IEEE

Date of Publication:

Aug. 2010

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.