By Topic

A general framework for comparing numerical uncertainty theories

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Umkehrer, E. ; Inst. fur Med. Psychol., Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ., Munchen, Germany ; Schill, K.

Deciding which of the existing uncertainty theories is the appropriate one to use in the formalization of a given problem is still a difficult task. It is possible to compare these theories either using pragmatic considerations (e.g. efficiency) or experimentally applying them on a set of problems; however, up to now there is no general frame in which we can compare the uncertainty theories with respect to their meanings. Our work aims to develop a general formalism for representing and reasoning with uncertain knowledge, which provides such a framework and is not restricted in using one specific uncertainty theory as a basis. This formalism is based on the work of Carnap's logical foundation of probability. But, instead of propositions, we regard distinctions as elementary notions. Up until now, the following theories can be expressed within the framework: Bayes theory, fuzzy set theory, Dempster/Shafer theory (belief functions) and upper/lower probability theory

Published in:

Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, 1995, and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society. Proceedings of ISUMA - NAFIPS '95., Third International Symposium on

Date of Conference:

17-19 Sep 1995