Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Data parallel FPGA workloads: Software versus hardware

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Yiannacouras, P. ; Edward S. Rogers Sr. Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada ; Steffan, J.G. ; Rose, J.

Commercial soft processors are unable to effectively exploit the data parallelism present in many embedded systems workloads, requiring FPGA designers to exploit it (laboriously) with manual hardware design. Recent research has demonstrated that soft processors augmented with support for vector instructions provide significant improvements in performance and scalability for data parallel workloads. These soft vector processors provide a software environment for quickly encoding data parallel computation, but their competitiveness with manual hardware design in terms of area and performance remains unknown. In this work, using an FPGA platform equipped with DDR memory executing data-parallel EEMBC embedded benchmarks, we measure the area/performance gaps between (i) a scalar soft processor, (ii) our improved soft vector processor, and (iii) custom FPGA hardware. We demonstrate that the 432times wall clock performance gap between scalar executed C and custom hardware can be reduced significantly to 17times using our improved soft vector processor, while silicon-efficiency is improved by 3times in terms of area delay product. We modified the architecture to mitigate three key advantages we observed in custom hardware: loop overhead, data delivery, and exact resource usage. Combined these improvements increase performance by 3times and reduce area by almost half, significantly reducing the need for designers to resort to more challenging custom hardware implementations.

Published in:

Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 2009. FPL 2009. International Conference on

Date of Conference:

Aug. 31 2009-Sept. 2 2009

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.