By Topic

Straight-Party Voting: What Do Voters Think?

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Campbell, B.A. ; Psychol. Dept., Rice Univ., Houston, TX, USA ; Byrne, M.D.

One of the options available to a sizable minority of U.S. voters is the ability to, with a single action, cast votes in multiple races; this is termed straight-party voting (SPV). SPV is implemented inconsistently across the U.S. and this may result in voter confusion, threatening the integrity of elections. We presented survey respondents with multiple SPV scenarios, testing both their understanding of SPV-marked ballots and their likelihood of using SPV to make multiple selections on a ballot. Participants were also asked their opinions on how SPV ought to work. Voters had significant difficulty in interpreting SPV ballots and were reluctant to generate them, though this was improved when ballots had more clear and detailed instructions. Participants also tended to believe that SPV should not work the way they believed it had worked on ballots they had previously seen. Overall, our results suggest that SPV is a likely cause of voter confusion, suggesting further research on the usability of straight-party voting systems.

Published in:

Information Forensics and Security, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:4 ,  Issue: 4 )