By Topic

An Epistemic Approach to Coercion-Resistance for Electronic Voting Protocols

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kusters, R. ; Univ. of Trier, Trier, Germany ; Truderung, T.

Coercion resistance is an important and one of the most intricate security requirements of electronic voting protocols. Several definitions of coercion-resistance have been proposed in the literature,including definitions based on symbolic models.However, existing definitions in such models are rather restricted in their scope and quite complex.In this paper, we therefore propose a new definition of coercion resistance in a symbolic setting, based on an epistemic approach. Our definition is relatively simple and intuitive. It allows for a fine-grained formulation of coercion resistance and can be stated independently of a specific, symbolic protocol and adversary model. As a proof of concept,we apply our definition to three voting protocols. In particular, we carry out the first rigorous analysis of the recently proposed Civitas system. We precisely identify those conditions under which this system guarantees coercion resistance or fails to be coercion resistant. We also analyze protocols proposed by Lee et al. and Okamoto.

Published in:

Security and Privacy, 2009 30th IEEE Symposium on

Date of Conference:

17-20 May 2009