By Topic

Design and performance analysis of a practical load-balanced switch

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Yanming Shen ; Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Eng., Dalian Univ. of Technol., Dalian, China ; Panwar, S.S. ; Chao, H.J.

The load-balanced (LB) switch proposed by C.S. Chang et al. consists of two stages. First, a load-balancing stage converts arriving packets into uniform traffic. Then, a forwarding stage transfers packets from the line-cards to their final output destination. Load-balanced switches do not need a centralized scheduler and can achieve 100% throughput for a broad class of traffic distributions. However, load-balanced switches may cause packets at the output port to be out of sequence. Several schemes have been proposed to tackle the out of- sequence problem of the load-balanced switch. They are either too complex to implement, or introduce a large additional delay. In this paper, we present a practical load-balanced switch, called the Byte-Focal switch, which uses packet-by-packet scheduling to significantly improve the delay performance over switches of comparable complexity. We prove that the queues at the input need only finite buffering, and that the overall switch is stable under any traffic matrix. Our analysis shows that the average queuing delay is roughly linear with the switch size N, and although the worst case resequencing delay is N2, the average resequencing delay is much smaller. This means that we can reduce the required resequencing buffer size significantly.

Published in:

Communications, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:57 ,  Issue: 8 )