By Topic

Publication, ethics, and scientific integrity

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)

The vast majority of scientists are honest and dedicated professionals who are not fudging data, plagiarizing their colleagues' research, or abusing patients. These are the felonies of scientific practice, and many scientists feel that the reputation of science has been unfairly damaged by the misconduct of a few of their colleagues. The author suggests a complacency about scientific integrity that he believes is mistaken and dangerous. It is tempting to think that because only a tiny fraction of scientists are guilty of this kind of misconduct, then there is no cause for alarm. One of the most widespread and corrosive practices that undermines scientific integrity is “salami science,” slicing a research study into the thinnest possible slices in order to maximize the number of publications

Published in:

Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE  (Volume:15 ,  Issue: 4 )