By Topic

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Ultraviolet light amplification by cool green phosphorus chemiluminescence flame’ ’’ 

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
VanZee, Richard J. ; Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 ; Khan, Ahsan U.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link: 

A recent report of ultraviolet light amplification by the cool green phosphorus chemiluminescence flame in the 200–400 nm region, interpreted as an optical gain phenomenon via stimulated emission, has been critized by Benard. Claiming that the rate of chemical reaction is several orders of magnitude too small to support the observed amplification, he has interpreted our result as a focusing phenomenon. In this communication, we point out that an improper spectral parameter was used to evaluate the rate of chemical reaction, and that his claim that focusing is responsible for our observation is inconsistent with our experiments. Nonrecognition of the broadened multilevel inversion in the ambient atmospheric flame is the probable source of his erroneous conclusion.

Published in:

Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:53 ,  Issue: 10 )