By Topic

Iterative approaches describing atomic diffusion in finite single‐ and two‐phase systems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Houska, C.R. ; Department of Materials Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 ; Unnam, J.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link: 

Iterative solutions are given for planar one‐dimensional atomic diffusion in finite single‐ and two‐phase systems. They are usable for any continuous variation of the interdiffusion coefficient D (C) within each phase, and need not be fitted to special functions such as a power series or an exponential function. Modified integral functions similar to one first proposed by Boltzmann are used along with a conservation criterion to locate the interface position ξ. Computer time for the iterative solutions is about two to three magnitudes shorter than finite‐difference (F‐D) calculations because of the rapid convergence of the integral equations. The accuracy of these approximate forms is considered. Excellent agreement was obtained between F‐D calculations and the iterative approach for semi‐infinite single‐phase systems. Good agreement is also found for two‐phase systems; however, the accuracy varies with the solubility gap size Cβα-Cαβ. The best results are obtained for gaps larger than 0.7 which includes most eutectic systems. Calculations of composition profiles which are based upon the maximum solid solubilities for the Cu‐Ag system are within 1% of the F‐D calculations.

Published in:

Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:47 ,  Issue: 10 )