Scheduled System Maintenance:
On May 6th, single article purchases and IEEE account management will be unavailable from 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM ET (12:00 - 16:00 UTC). We apologize for the inconvenience.
By Topic

Gibbs Random Field Models for Model-Based Despeckling of SAR Images

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Espinoza Molina, D. ; Remote Sensing Technol. Inst., German Aerosp. Center, Wessling, Germany ; Gleich, D. ; Datcu, M.

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are affected by multiplicative noise called speckle. This noise makes automatic image classification and image interpretation difficult. Thus, many methods have been developed to remove speckle from SAR images while preserving the useful information of the scene such as texture and geometry. In this letter, a comparison between three different despeckling methods based on a Bayesian approach and Gibbs random fields is made. The used methods are Gauss-Markov random field (GMRF) and autobinomial modeling, which operate in the image domain, and the GMRF approach, which operates in the wavelet domain. Our methods are evaluated with synthetic and real SAR data (TerraSAR-X images). The experimental results show that, with these three methods, the speckle is well removed while structures are preserved; quantitative measures show that the autobinomial method provides the best smoothness and sharpness criteria in real SAR data, while the wavelet-based method generates the smallest bias.

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE  (Volume:7 ,  Issue: 1 )