By Topic

A Modified Moving Horizon Estimator for In Situ Sensing of a Chemical Vapor Deposition Process

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Rentian Xiong ; Sch. of Chem. & Biomol. Eng., Georgia Inst. of Technol., Atlanta, GA, USA ; Martha Anne Grover

A modified moving horizon estimator (mMHE) was developed to estimate thin film thickness, growth rate, and refractive indices in situ from a dual-wavelength reflectance measurement during chemical vapor deposition. In this application, mMHE combines the advantage of high speed of the recursive least squares estimator (RLS) and the accuracy of the moving horizon estimator (MHE). A simulated deposition process with drifting growth rate was used as a benchmark to compare the performance of RLS, MHE, mMHE, and the extended Kalman filter (EKF). The results indicate that mMHE yields more accurate estimates than RLS by incorporating a priori estimates in the optimization function. Improved accuracy of mMHE over EKF was obtained due to the horizon of data used at each time step. In addition, mMHE provided similar accuracy to MHE for short horizons, and it was much faster than MHE. RLS, MHE, mMHE, and EKF were also compared on an experimental chemical vapor deposition system where a yttrium oxide thin film was deposited on a silicon substrate. The ex situ ellipsometry characterization indicated that a more accurate and robust estimate was obtained by MHE and mMHE, compared to the RLS and EKF estimates.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology  (Volume:17 ,  Issue: 5 )