Skip to Main Content
It is difficult to state whether a certain software product is developed securely enough. An evaluation methodology that takes the security assurance methods used during the software development lifecycle into account is one step closer to a solution to this problem. In this paper we discuss our first heuristics for security assurance evaluation that would give guidelines on the trustworthiness of the software development lifecycle. The input for evaluations include the context, expert opinions, outcome of the methods and reputation. Our evaluation heuristics are a step towards being able to deduce about the level of assurance for a software process, compared to a certain context-specific baseline.