Close category search window
 

Models for phase-change of Ge2Sb2Te5 in optical and electrical memory devices

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Senkader, S. ; University of Exeter, School of Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, Exeter EX4 4QF, United Kingdom ; Wright, C.D.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1063/1.1633984 

We investigated three different modeling approaches to simulate the crystallization behavior of Ge2Sb2Te5 in optical and, very recently, electrical phase-change memories. The first of these models is based on the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov (JMAK) formalism to calculate the fraction of crystallized material during isothermal anneals. In the literature, this model is widely used, but parameters of the model reported by different investigators vary considerably. We have shown that these discrepancies can be attributed to the inappropriate use of the JMAK approach. In order to overcome the restrictions imposed by JMAK theory, generalizations based on classical nucleation theory have been suggested. Material parameters required by the theory, such as viscosity, diffusivity, and fusion enthalpy of Ge2Sb2Te5, have been deduced from published experiments. Uncertainty in the material parameters in combination with approximate expressions used by the classical nucleation theory, however, lead us to suggest a comprehensive model based on rate equations. Although it is more complicated, this modeling approach has yielded more favorable and reliable results. We have discussed different simulation–experiment comparisons to illustrate the capabilities of the model. © 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Published in:
Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:95 ,  Issue: 2 )

Date of Publication: Jan 2004

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.