By Topic

Comparison of mixed anion, InAsyP1-y and mixed cation, InxAl1-xAs metamorphic buffers grown by molecular beam epitaxy on (100) InP substrates

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)
Hudait, M.K. ; Department of Electrical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 ; Lin, Y. ; Palmisiano, M.N. ; Tivarus, C.
more authors

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link: 

The structural, morphological, and defect properties of mixed anion, InAsyP1-y and mixed cation, InxAl1-xAs metamorphic step-graded buffers grown on InP substrates are investigated and compared. Two types of buffers were grown to span the identical range of lattice constants and lattice mismatch (∼1.1–1.2%) on (100) InP substrates by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. Symmetric relaxation of ∼90% in the two orthogonal <110> directions with minimal lattice tilt was observed for the terminal InAs0.4P0.6 and In0.7Al0.3As overlayers of each graded buffer type, indicating nearly equal numbers of α and β dislocations were formed during the relaxation process and that the relaxation is near equilibrium and hence insensitive to asymmetric dislocation kinetics. Atomic force microscopy reveals extremely ordered crosshatch morphology and very low root mean square (rms) roughness of ∼2.2 nm for the InAsP relaxed buffers compared to the InAlAs relaxed buffers (∼7.3 nm) at the same degree of lattice mismatch with respect to the InP substrates. Moreover, phase decomposition is observed for the InAlAs buffers, whereas InAsP buffers displayed ideal, step-graded buffer characteristics. The impact of the structural differences between the two buffer types on metamorphic devices was demonstrated by comparing identical 0.6 eV band gap lattice-mismatched In0.69Ga0.31As thermophotovoltaic (TPV) devices that were grown on these buffers. Clearly superior device performance was achieved on InAsyP1-y buffers, which is attributed primarily to the impact of layer roughness on the carrier recombination rates near the front window/emitter interface of the TPV devices. © 2004 American Institute of Physics.

Published in:

Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:95 ,  Issue: 8 )