Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Effect of a dimensional crossover on the upper critical field of practical Nb–Ti alloy superconductors

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Cooley, L.D. ; Applied Superconductivity Center, University of Wisconsin, 1500 Engineering Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 ; Hawes, C.D.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1063/1.371581 

Multilayers of a Nb0.37Ti0.63 alloy, a chief material of superconducting magnet technology, and a Cu0.95Sn0.05 or Cu0.70Ni0.30 alloy exhibit a dimensional crossover with a decreasing bilayer period Λ=dN+dS, where dS=3dN. Cusps of Hc2(θ) and square root Hc2||(T) develop when Λ≤40 nm, which indicate a crossover to 2D behavior from 3D behavior seen at Λ=60 nm. Full proximity coupling of Cu–Sn layers for Λ=13 nm restores isotropic angular dependence, but with sharply lower Hc2 values. By contrast, proximity coupling was suppressed by magnetic Cu–Ni layers, and 2D behavior was retained while Tc fell below 4 K for Λ≪20 nm. The data are consistent with numeric results obtained by Takahashi and Tachiki [Phys. Rev. B 33, 4620 (1986)] when the variation of the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer pairing potential is the primary cause of the dimensional crossover. Since practical Nb–Ti conductors have a layered nanostructure, this result suggests that a dimensional crossover should also be found in wires. However, the 3D–2D crossover occurs when Λ is much greater than the separation of the flux lines at high field (10–20 nm) and above the range where optimum flux pinning is found. This implies that a 2D state (for insulating or magnetic layers) or a 2D strongly coupled state (for normal metals) exists when flux pinni- ng is strongest. These implications are discussed in the context of practical Nb–Ti wires used in superconducting magnet technology. © 1999 American Institute of Physics.

Published in:

Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:86 ,  Issue: 10 )

Date of Publication:

Nov 1999

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.