Close category search window
 

Different “average” nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation times for correlation with fluid-flow permeability and irreducible water saturation in water-saturated sandstones

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Borgia, G.C. ; University of Bologna, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Mineraria, e Delle Tecnolgie Ambientali, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy ; Brown, R.J.S. ; Fantazzini, P.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1063/1.366222 

Fluid-flow properties of porous media, such as permeability k and irreducible water saturation Swi, can be estimated from water 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation data, but there are basic questions regarding data processing and interpretation. We found that Swi and k are better estimated if different forms of “average” relaxation time are used. NMR longitudinal relaxation data for a suite of 106 water-saturated clean sandstones were used. Sandstones represent a specialized class of porous media, where even for small porosity, substantially all pore space is connected. The sandstones exhibit distributions of relaxation times ranging over factors from at least 10 to more than 103. We tried several forms of “average” relaxation time T. One family of Ts is p>1/p, where lim p→0 gives the geometric mean. The best estimator we found for Swi uses a form of average relaxation time only, rather than relaxation time cutoff. The time used can be any of several forms of T, giving more emphasis to short times than the geometric mean does. On the contrary, the best T for estimating permeability without other information is precisely the geometric mean. The best estimates of permeability came from fits of ln (k/Φ) using Ts with emphasis at slightly longer times. While Swi is better estimated by using all the data points (starting from our minimum 0.4 ms), k is better estimated by sta- rting at a few ms, that is by ignoring a non-negligible fraction of the signal for some samples. These results can be obtained also by using computations that do not need to invert multiexponential relaxation data, and good results are obtained even with only a few data points. The results are compatible with the reasonable picture, where high surface-to-volume pores, giving signal components with short relaxation times but not contributing to the permeability, are important in determining the fraction of the wetting phase which remains trapped in the solid matrix after displacement with a nonwetting phase. © 1997 American Institute of Physics.

Published in:
Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:82 ,  Issue: 9 )

Date of Publication: Nov 1997

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.