Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Continuing degradation of the SiO2/Si interface after hot hole stress

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Al-kofahi, I.S. ; Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, United Kingdom ; Zhang, J.F. ; Groeseneken, G.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1063/1.363969 

This article reports new experimental results on the continuing interface trap generation post-hot hole injection and investigates the generation mechanism. The generation post-hole injection is found to be two orders of magnitude slower than that post-irradiation and cannot be satisfactorily explained by the transportation of hydrogen species across the gate oxide. The role played by the recombination of trapped holes with free electrons is examined. There is a lack of correlation between the trapped hole removal and the interface trap creation, which is against the prediction of the trapped hole conversion model. The results indicate that the interface traps generated during and post-stress originate from two different defects. The defect responsible for post-stress generation is excited by hole injection and then converted into an interface trap if a positive gate bias is applied. It is found that generation in a poly-Si gated metal–oxide–semiconductor field effect transistor behaves differently from that in an Al-gated device. The possible causes for this difference are discussed. © 1997 American Institute of Physics.

Published in:

Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:81 ,  Issue: 6 )

Date of Publication:

Mar 1997

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.