By Topic

Cholesteric liquid‐crystal displays illuminated by diffuse and partially diffuse light

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
St.John, W.D. ; Liquid Crystal Institute, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242 ; Lu, Z.‐J. ; Doane, J.W. ; Taheri, B.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link: 

We report on the photometric and colorimetric properties of surface and polymer network stabilized reflective cholesteric displays. Both diffuse and partially diffuse illumination are used, the latter being an experimental approach to emulating typical room light conditions. It is shown that addition of polymer increases the field of view while decreasing angular dependence of the color quantities: hue, chroma, and lightness. Total luminance and contrast ratio, however, are also decreased. Therefore, it is concluded that optimum polymer concentration is dependent on the viewing geometry. Luminance and contrast ratio of the surface stabilized cells exceeded that of polymer stabilized cell when viewed in a geometry void of specular reflection. Colorimetric quantities in surface stabilized cells are less sensitive to illumination geometry. This suggests that for displays in which specular reflection has been suppressed, surface treatment represents the best method of stabilization. If the viewing angle allows specular reflection, polymer stabilization yields the largest luminance and contrast ratio. This behavior is explained in terms of angular distribution of helical axes due to presence of the stabilizer. © 1996 American Institute of Physics.

Published in:

Journal of Applied Physics  (Volume:80 ,  Issue: 1 )