By Topic

A Comparative Perspective of Risk Management in the United States and Japan

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Kazuhiko Kawamura ; Management of Technology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

A comparative analysis of risk management approaches in the United States and Japan is presented. Generally speaking, risk management institutions and authorities in both countries confront similar difficulties in each aspect of risk management, from identification to regulation and resolution. However, there are important differences between the two countries in the approaches and the sources utilized to manage risks. The Japanese tendency to use administrative guidance, informal persuation, and education in its governance activities contrasts sharply with the more open and adversarial policy-making process in the United States. These general characteristics of governance carry squarely over into each country's characteristic risk management processes.

Published in:

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine  (Volume:6 ,  Issue: 3 )