Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Development of a wall shear stress integral measurement and analysis system for two-phase flow boundary layers

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Dominguez-Ontiveros, Elvis E. ; Department of Nuclear Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3133 ; Estrada-Perez, Carlos E. ; Ortiz-Villafuerte, Javier ; Hassan, Yassin A.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1063/1.2360887 

An integral system was developed for the measurement and analysis of wall shear stress data from a two-phase boundary layer flow. Three different and independent measurement techniques are incorporated in a synchronized acquisition system. The three measurement techniques are the particle tracking velocimetry, a differential pressure transducer, and an optical wall shear stress sensor. Each of these techniques provides complementary information that helps in the description and understanding of the phenomena involved in a two-phase boundary layer. The practical implementation of the integral measurement and analysis system is demonstrated with the measurement of the wall shear stress of a microbubble laden boundary layer flow in a channel. The agreement in the results of the wall shear stress from the three synchronized measurements techniques was 93% for the single-phase case and 92.8% for the two-phase flow measurements. Moreover, independent measurements with each technique show no appreciable change in the values obtained when they were all synchronized. The advantages and limitations of each individual technique are discussed for measurement and analysis of two-phase flow data, as well the advantages of having an integral system that combines the information from all measurement techniques at the same time.

Published in:

Review of Scientific Instruments  (Volume:77 ,  Issue: 10 )

Date of Publication:

Oct 2006

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.