Close category search window
 

Heterointerface dipoles: Applications to (a) Si–SiO2, (b) nitrided Si–N–SiO2, and (c) SiC–SiO2 interfaces

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Lucovsky, G. ; Department of Physics, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8202 ; Yang, H. ; Massoud, H.Z.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1116/1.590147 

This article identifies procedures to calculate charge-transfer dipoles at semiconductor–dielectric interfaces, focusing primarily on the Si–SiO2 system. Since SiO2 is more polar than Si, there is a transfer of electrons from Si to SiO2 to balance the difference in chemical potentials creating a dipole localized at the semiconductor–dielectric interface. This dipole increases the conduction-band offset energy difference between Si and SiO2, and therefore, has important effects on interface electrical and optical properties. Empirical chemistry and ab initio methods have been applied to molecular clusters which emulate the interface bonding, and have been used to calculate interfacial charge transfer at (i) abrupt Si–SiO2 interfaces and (ii) nitrided Si–N–SiO2 interfaces. Additional calculations have applied to determine the average dipoles at Si–SiO2 interfaces with suboxide bonding in excess of the monolayer level required to form an ideal interface. The calculations support experimental data that indicate that the effective conduction-band offset energies at nitrided Si–N–SiO2 interfaces and at interfaces with minimized suboxide bonding are essentially the same. Finally, the calculations have been extended to SiC–SiO2 interfaces to illustrate the effects of changing from a homopolar to a more ionic or heteropolar semiconductor. © 1998 American Vacuum- - Society.

Published in:
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures  (Volume:16 ,  Issue: 4 )

Date of Publication: Jul 1998

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.