Scheduled System Maintenance on December 17th, 2014:
IEEE Xplore will be upgraded between 2:00 and 5:00 PM EST (18:00 - 21:00) UTC. During this time there may be intermittent impact on performance. We apologize for any inconvenience.
By Topic

Role of etch pattern fidelity in the printing of optical proximity corrected photomasks

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

7 Author(s)
Kornblit, A. ; AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 ; DeMarco, J.J. ; Garofalo, J. ; Mixon, D.A.
more authors

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1116/1.588284 

Optical proximity effect correction has been proven to improve critical dimension control, increase overlay margins, and, when used with phase‐shifting masks and/or modified illumination and mask‐plane nonprinting assist features, also extend resolution and increase depth of focus of current generation lithographic exposure technology. While the potential enhancements afforded by such schemes are enticing, their successful implementation is imposing demands on mask fabrication, inspection, and repair which surpass the state of the art in industry today. This article focuses on the influence of the mask pattern fidelity on the ensuing wafer lithographic performance. Both wet and dry etch techniques were applied to an ensemble of proximity‐corrected test patterns using standard binary chrome‐on‐glass test masks. The chrome was wet etched with polybutene sulfone as the masking resist using an optimized zero‐bias process. For comparison, the same test structures delineated with a silicon containing resist were also reactive ion etched with Cl2/O2/N2 chemistry, developed to retain submicron pattern fidelity, and anisotropic absorber wall profile. Comparative wet and dry‐etched mask and resulting wafer metrology results are presented for 5× i‐line and 4× deep ultraviolet exposures. © 1995 American Vacuum Society

Published in:

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures  (Volume:13 ,  Issue: 6 )